Panel Rules in Favor of Neulander Judge
A mistrial was declared Nov. 13 after a jury that had spent more than 40 hours deliberating in the case could not reach a unanimous verdict on any of the three charges against Neulander.
A day after, Superior Court Judge Linda G. Baxter said she would not lift her restrictions on the flock of reporters covering the case. The media had been ordered not to contact jurors or publish their names or likenesses.
While such a ruling is common during a trial, it's unusual after a trial has ended.
The three-judge panel said Baxter took the right course, though it was leaving Philadelphia Newspapers Inc., which challenged Baxter's order, the right to appeal.
The court found "potential for harm inheres in the subtly coercive effect the media's account of prior deliberations would undoubtedly have on the ability of the jury on retrial to be fair."
The judges were also bothered, as Baxter was, that one television station broadcast footage of jurors leaving the courthouse after the mistrial was declared and that The Philadelphia Inquirer published a story that had the name of one juror and comments from another, who was not named.
History showed a "strong likelihood that continued publicity predictably will impair the defendant's right to a fair trial," the panel ruled.
(Copyright 2001 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
advertisement

Author: 6 - ABC, Action News
Archives
The Substance of Weight-Loss Medicine
Course Guide
Closing the Deal
Strength in Numbers
Best of Home & Garden 2025
Built on Strength
Clutch Competitors
Giving Back
Leaving a Legacy
Best of Health Care 2025
Going Green
Looking to Rebound
Flying High
'He Passed The Torch... I Have to Keep It Growing'
Investing in the Future
More...